Author Archives:
Black and Latino in America: The Race to Incarcerate

The number of persons in U.S. prisons is more than 2 million—roughly equal to the entire population of Houston, Texas. The massive U.S. prison population does not mirror the demographic profile of U.S. society, however. The vast majority of U.S. prisoners are poor, uneducated, unskilled, emotionally or psychologically troubled, drug and/or alcohol dependent, and either Black or Latino.
The racial disparity between prisoners and the general population is particularly profound. Blacks and Latinos together comprise less than 30% of the general population but nearly 70% of the prison population! How can this be? Conventional–that is, uninformed–wisdom suggests the reason Blacks and Latinos represent the majority of the prison population is that they commit the majority of all crimes in the U.S. That is simply not the case. The reality is that Blacks and Latinos are differentially targeted and processed by the U.S. criminal justice system.
Consider these facts: Blacks alone make up 12% of the U.S. population and comprise 14% of all illegal drug users, but they represent 35% of all drug arrests, 55% of all convictions for drug crimes, and 75% of all those who go to prison for drug crimes! Disturbingly, racial disparity in justice system processing exists for other crimes as well. The startling statistics reveal that racially biased processing is common throughout the criminal justice system in the U.S. Perhaps this should not be surprising, however. After all, one must remember that the police, district attorneys and judges all have tremendous discretion in whom to arrest, prosecute and sentence.
It is time to pull the blindfold off of lady justice and admit that she is not blind after all. She sees quite well, indeed. Her acute but sometimes prejudiced and biased vision unfortunately leads her to differentially target and process many poor Blacks and Latinos. The result is a prison population that does not fairly or accurately reflect the true picture or color of crime in the U.S. Let’s put an end to such practices and deliver justice fairly to all citizens.
Tune in for “An hour to kill with Doc Bonn” Friday, October 12, 2012 at 12pm ET when he discusses injustices in the criminal justice system with special guest, Dr. Kesha Moore, Professor of Sociology at Drew University and expert in race, urban neighborhoods and community development. Listen live: http://groups.drew.edu/wmnj/
Dr. Scott Bonn is Professor of Sociology and Criminology at Drew University and a media expert. He is the author of the critically acclaimed book “Mass Deception: Moral Panic and the U.S. War on Iraq,” and is currently writing a book about the public’s fascination with serial killers. Follow him @DocBonn on Twitter.
Related articles
- Federal prisons lock up Latinos at higher rate than Colorado prisons (denverpost.com)
- Ten Ways To Reduce The Prison Population In America (businessinsider.com)
- The Implicit Situation of Criminal Justice (thesituationist.wordpress.com)
- Racism (26): Racism in Criminal Justice (filipspagnoli.wordpress.com)
- What can we do about the serious bullying problem in the U.S.? (docbonn.wordpress.com)
- Dr. Scott Bonn Announces a NEW Radio Show: “An Hour to Kill With Doc Bonn” on WMNJ Radio (imaginepublicity.com)
- Doc Bonn shares the real life atrocity tale of serial killer Edmund Kemper (docbonn.wordpress.com)

Doc Bonn shares the real life atrocity tale of serial killer Edmund Kemper

The following is a real life horror story and atrocity tale that defies comprehension. Edmund Kemper III, a U.S. serial killer and necrophile, also known as “The Co-ed Killer,” was born December 18, 1948, in Burbank, CA. He was arrested in April, 1973, at the age of 24, after murdering six female students, his own mother, and her mother’s best friend.
Despite his relative youth upon capture, Kemper had actually committed his first two murders nearly a decade earlier. Kemper was an extremely intelligent child but he engaged in sociopathic behavior early on, including the torture and killing of animals, a common childhood practice among nearly half of all serial killers. During childhood, Kemper was physically and emotionally abused by his alcoholic mother, Clarnell, who was divorced from his father. Clarnell frequently locked her son in a dark basement alone at night.
Not too surprisingly, Edmund grew up to hate his mother and, at the age of 14, ran away from home in search of his father in Van Nuys, CA. After locating but being rejected by his father, young Edmund was sent to live with his paternal grandmother and grandfather in North Fork, CA. Kemper claims that his grandmother, similar to his mother, was very abusive and he disliked her intensely.
In 1964, at the age of 15, Edmund shot his grandmother in the head allegedly just to see what it felt like, and then killed his grandfather, too, because he knew that his grandfather would be angry at him for killing his grandmother. Kemper was committed to the Atascadero State Hospital for the criminally insane. To his chagrin, he was released into his mother’s care in 1969, after less than five years of confinement and treatment. His juvenile criminal record was expunged.
As a young adult, Kemper stood six-foot-nine and weighed 280 pounds. He frequently thought about killing his mother but wasn’t yet ready to pursue that goal. The prospect of killing his mother without first perfecting his murder skills on others was too overwhelming for Kemper. So, between May, 1972, and February, 1973, Kemper embarked on a series of six shocking serial murders in which he picked up hitchhiking female students along the highway and then transported them to rural areas where he would kill them, decapitate, and have sex with their corpses. He collected their dismembered heads in his apartment and would later have sex with them, too.
Like certain other notorious serial killers such as Dennis Rader, who called himself “Bind, Torture, Kill” based on his actual criminal motivations and modus operandi, Ed Kemper sought public recognition and acclaim for his murders. This led him to befriend, socialize and drink in a bar called “The Jury Room” with the very law enforcement officers who were actually pursuing the man they called “Big Eddie.”
After finally realizing his ultimate fantasy of killing his mother (and her best friend) on Good Friday, 1973, and having sex with her decapitated head, Edmund Kemper confessed what he had done to authorities by telephone. However, the police initially refused to believe him, thinking that “Big Eddie” was just pulling a prank on them. After several calls and the disclosure of information that only the killer would know, Kemper finally convinced the police that he was “The Co-ed Killer.” He was arrested and later charged with eight murders in the first degree. Kemper was found guilty and given a life sentence because there was a stay on the death penalty in the U.S. at the time of his conviction.
Given his homicidal obsession with his mother, one might wonder if killing her finally exorcised the demons that tormented Edmund Kemper and
gave him closure. Perhaps you can decide for yourself based on his following actual words. Sometime after his conviction, Kemper was asked allegedly by a Cosmopolitan magazine reporter during a prison interview how he felt when he saw a pretty girl. He said, “One side of me says, I’d like to talk to her, date her. The other side says, I wonder how her head would look on a stick.”
What are your reactions to this real life atrocity tale? I’d like to hear from you.
Dr. Scott Bonn is Professor of Sociology and Criminology at Drew University in Madison, NJ. He is the author of the critically acclaimed book “Mass Deception: Moral Panic and the U.S. War on Iraq”and is currently writing a book about the public’s fascination with psychopathic serial killers in reality and fiction. He is @DocBonn on Twitter.
Related articles
- Dr. Scott Bonn Appears in A&E Feature: The Long Island Serial Killer (imaginepublicity.com)
- Long Island Serial Killer Case (antihumantraffickingnews.blogspot.com)
- Crime Wire Discusses the Colorado Mass Murders with Dr. Scott Bonn (crimewire.blogspot.com)
- Crime Wire: Part II Dr. Scott Bonn Discusses the Long Island Serial Killer (crimewire.blogspot.com)
- The Roth Show: Dr. Scott Bonn Talks Criminology and Serial Killers (imaginepublicity.com)
- Crime Wire: BULLIES, What Makes Them Tick? (crimewire.blogspot.com)

Doc Bonn Explains White-Collar Crime and Elite Deviance.

Would you be surprised to know that white-collar crime is far more costly to U.S. society than so-called street crime? In fact, it is 100 times more costly. Yet so much attention is given to street crime by the media, law enforcement and politicians that many of us do not recognize the extent or terrible consequences of white-collar crime and elite deviance in the U.S.
Exactly what are white-collar crime and elite deviance? White-collar crime involves lying, cheating, and stealing by business and government professionals within the context of their employment. The term white-collar crime—reportedly coined in 1939—is now synonymous with the full range of frauds committed by business and government professionals.
Contrary to what many people believe, white-collar crime is not a victimless crime. A single scam can destroy a company, devastate families by wiping out their life savings, or cost investors billions of dollars (or even all three, as in the infamous Enron case). Today’s fraud schemes are more sophisticated than ever, and we are dedicated to using our skills to track down the culprits and stop scams before they start.
Listen to Doc Bonn’s analysis of white collar crime on a recent episode of
Crime Wire:
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/insidelenz/2012/08/08/crime-wire
Unfortunately, the crimes of privileged individuals within the context of either legitimate corporations or government offices frequently go undetected and unprosecuted due to their power and influence in society. As far back as 1956, the late sociologist C. Wright Mills observed that a small group of wealthy and powerful individuals control America’s dominant institutions (i.e., politics, economy and the military) and they are insulated from public scrutiny. Mills called this group the power elite. Interestingly, Mills was echoed in 1961 by President Eisenhower in his farewell address when he warned of the self-serving and criminal acts of the “military-industrial complex”—that is, his term for the power elite.
A central contradiction of the power elite is that they frequently violate the very laws they are sworn to uphold. Mills argued that bound by mutual interests, the power elite periodically commit acts of elite wrongdoing (e.g., dumping toxic waste) and enact policies (e.g., declaration of an unprovoked war) that are designed to perpetuate their power and preserve their control over society. Mills stated that elite acts that cause either physical or social harm represent the higher immorality of the power elite.
Mills argued that not only crime per se, but also governmental deeds that cause social harm, regardless of their criminality in a legal sense, be included in the conceptual definition. Another U.S. sociologist named David Simon in 1995 expanded upon Mills’ concept of the higher immorality to include immoral or unethical acts in his concept of “elite deviance.” According to Simon, elite deviance is the deviant behavior of societal elites (the people who head governmental or corporate institutions) that makes them negative role models who encourage distrust, cynicism, and alienation among non-elites.
Acts of elite deviance take place in part because of the way corporate, political, and military intelligence institutions are structured: they are bureaucracies. Significantly, bureaucratic organizations are structured in ways that regularize crime and deviance. More specifically, bureaucracies are goal-oriented, amoral entities which exist to maximize profits and/or expand their own power. These goals encourage an ends over means mentality among the top commanders of bureaucracies. For example, the top executives of a public, for-profit corporation are well aware that the board of directors and shareholders are much more interested in meeting quarterly profit goals than they are in the actual decisions and actions required to meet those goals.
The higher immorality of the power elite is also possible because the elites do not have to win the moral consent of those over whom they hold power. Instead, a passive U.S. society simply trusts that the elites will act on behalf of the so-called public interest. C. Wright Mills argued that this condition is accompanied by a “fear of knowledge” and anti-intellectualism in modern society. Mills concluded that the higher immorality is a systematic feature of the American societal elite. Its general acceptance by the public without critique is an essential feature of modern U.S. society.
Dr. Scott Bonn is Professor of Criminology at Drew University and a media expert. He is the author of the critically acclaimed book “Mass Deception: Moral Panic and the U.S. War on Iraq.” Doc Bonn is currently researching and writing a book on the public’s fascination with serial homicide and psychopathic serial killers in fact and fiction. Follow him @DocBonn on Twitter and email him directly at docbonn1@gmail.com.
Related articles
- Dr. Scott Bonn Appears in A&E Feature: The Long Island Serial Killer (imaginepublicity.com)
- Crime Wire: Crime Wears a White Collar! (dennisngriffin.com)
- The Roth Show: Dr. Scott Bonn Talks Criminology and Serial Killers (imaginepublicity.com)
- Crime Wire: Part II Dr. Scott Bonn Discusses the Long Island Serial Killer (crimewire.blogspot.com)
- The Susan Murphy Milano Show with Dr. Scott Bonn, Criminologist, Author and Professor (imaginepublicity.com)

James Holmes and The Dark Knight Massacre: What Motivates Mass Murder?

The Batman inspired movie theater massacre perpetrated by James Holmes is the latest incident of mass murder to rock U.S. society. In some ways, Holmes is very typical of other mass murderers, and in some ways he definitely is not. As a criminologist who studies the minds of killers, I offer my initial insights into the twisted “Joker” James Holmes.
Dr. Scott Bonn’s recent appearance on Crime Wire discussing the Colorado shooter, James Holmes: CLICK HERE
Holmes’ killing rampage on opening night of the film The Dark Knight Rises was a signature example of mass murder in terms of its design and execution. Mass murder is a one-time event that involves the killing of multiple people at one location. In a mass murder, the victims may be either randomly selected or targeted for a specific reason, such as retaliation, by the killer. A mass murder normally occurs when the perpetrator, who is often deeply troubled, suffers a psychotic break from reality and strikes out at his/her perceived tormentors in a blitz-like attack. James Holmes certainly fits that profile.
However, mass murderers are frequently, but not always, killed at the scene of the crime. This is where James Holmes is an aberration among mass murderers. Typically, mass murderers are either shot by law enforcement officers called to the crime scene or they take their own lives in a final act of suicide. From a psychological standpoint, mass murder is a premeditated act of vengeance against society by a desperate and fatalistic individual who typically has no intention of going away quietly.
The classic, tragic example of mass murder in recent years is the Virginia Tech massacre—a catastrophic school shooting—which took place on April 16, 2007, on the campus of Virginia Polytechnic Institute in Blacksburg, Virginia. In this terrible event, a very troubled student named Seung-Hui Cho shot and killed 32 people and wounded 17 others in two separate blitz attacks which occurred approximately two hours apart on the Virginia Tech campus. Cho ended his murderous rampage by turning his gun on himself and committing suicide. In addition to the 17 wounded, another six people were injured while escaping from classroom windows during the attacks. The Virginia Tech massacre is the deadliest shooting incident by a single gunman in U.S. history.
It is apparent that James Holmes is very different from the late Seung-Hui Cho. Holmes does not appear to be fatalistic and he clearly did not want to die at the scene of his carnage. In fact, I suspect that he is actually enjoying his new-found infamy. When he surrendered to law enforcement officials, Holmes reportedly said, “I am the Joker.” If you recall, in the film The Dark Knight, the late Heath Ledger as the Joker said, “I am an agent of chaos.”
Although it is possible that Holmes is faking his bizarre jailhouse and courtroom behavior since being apprehended, it is unlikely. He would have to be an incredible actor. On the contrary, I believe that he did suffer a psychotic break from reality—albeit in the form of a slow unraveling—in the months leading up to his rampage. We know that his performance in the neuroscience graduate program at the University of Colorado was in decline prior to dropping out completely in June. Moreover, he was being treated by a psychiatrist.
I believe that just like the Joker in The Dark Knight, James Holmes fancies himself an agent of chaos. In custody, he is reportedly defiant and unremorseful. I believe that Holmes was motivated to kill by a grandiose belief that society does not appreciate his self perceived genius. He most likely became enraged when the University of Colorado downgraded his performance. Consumed by resentment, he became determined to exercise his vengeance on society. His selection of the Joker as his public persona indicates both paranoia and profound narcissism on his part. Holmes felt unappreciated by the world and was determined to leave an indelible impression on the public consciousness.
It appears that the public will indeed be exposed to James Holmes for some time to come—fortunately in prison shackles. Whether or not he will be deemed mentally competent to stand trial is yet to be determined. One thing is certain, however. His days of striking fear in society are over because this terribly disturbed and ruthless killer will never, ever walk freely again.
Dr. Scott Bonn is Professor of Sociology and Criminology at Drew University in Madison, NJ. He is the author of the critically acclaimed book “Mass Deception: Moral Panic and the U.S. War on Iraq”and is currently writing a book about the public’s fascination with psychopathic serial killers in reality and fiction. He is @DocBonn on Twitter.
Related articles
- “The Batman Massacre” at Dark Knight Rises Premiere (herewomentalk.com)
- Doc Bonn Explains: The Difference Between Serial Killers, Spree Killers and Mass Murderers (docbonn.wordpress.com)
- Crime Wire Discusses the Colorado Mass Murders with Dr. Scott Bonn (crimewire.blogspot.com)
- The Dark Knight Massacre (neilschori.com)
- Parents Of ‘Dark Knight’ Shooting Suspect Puzzled, Distraught (losangeles.cbslocal.com)
- All I Need to Know About James Holmes (shepherdspiehole.typepad.com)

Sage Stallone is dead. Prescription drugs kill. Doctors enable addicted patients.

Sylvester Stallone’s son, Sage, is dead from a reported prescription drug overdose at the age of 36. He was found dead in his Los Angeles home on July 13, 2012. It is not yet known if his death was a suicide or an accidental overdose. Regardless of the coroner’s findings, Sage Stallone is another casualty of prescription drug abuse.
When someone with a high profile name like Stallone dies from a prescription drug overdose it brings renewed attention to this epidemic. Contrary to popular mythology, prescription drugs are more lethal than illegal or street drugs. In fact, prescription drug abuse and addiction kill far more people in the U.S. every year than all illegal drugs combined! Unfortunately, the problem is getting worse and, frequently, medical doctors enable their drug addicted patients by frivolously filling prescriptions.
Late last year, the murder trial of Dr. Conrad Murray brought global attention to the connected problems of prescription drug abuse and medical negligence. Dr. Murray was found guilty of negligent manslaughter in the wrongful death of pop music icon Michael Jackson. I believe that Conrad Murray, who was paid $150,000 per month by Michael Jackson to be his only patient, allowed greed to compromise his medical training and ethics. Stated differently, Dr. Murray was a highly paid, live-in drug dealer for Jackson.
However, to what extent is a prescription drug addict who overdoes, even accidently, responsible for his own death? Murray was a negligent and selfish doctor who should have known better than to prescribe lethal anesthesia as a sleep aid, but Michael Jackson was also a manipulative and desperate drug addict who begged him for the drug. Wasn’t Jackson ultimately responsible for what he put into his own body? Similarly, despite the tragic outcome, wasn’t Sage Stallone responsible for what he put into his own body?
Sometimes, pathological and codependent relationships between doctors and their patients can have unintended and tragic results. Prescription drug addiction and medical negligence in combination create a “perfect storm” of crime, personal disaster, and death in the U.S. As a society, we must address these growing and interconnected social problems before more lives are destroyed.
Scott Bonn, PhD, is a professor of criminology at Drew University in Madison, NJ. He is currently writing a book on the public’s fascination with serial killers and he is the author of the critically acclaimed book, “Mass Deception: Moral Panic and the U.S. War on Iraq.” He can be reached @DocBonn on Twitter.
Related articles
- Prescription drugs (ffeirio.wordpress.com)
- Scientist: Pushing OxyContin addicts to heroin reveals ‘utter failure’ of drug war (rawstory.com)
- Sage Stallone: Latest Victim of Prescription Drugs or Irresponsible Patient? (celebs.gather.com)
- Beware! Disgusting Lies of the Pharma Industry! (herewomentalk.com)
- What every parent should know about drugs (docbonn.wordpress.com)
- Dr. Scott Bonn Appears in A&E Feature: The Long Island Serial Killer (imaginepublicity.com)
- What to Do If You Suffer From a Medical Negligence (herewomentalk.com)












